Page 24 - Fall2020
P. 24

EXPOSURE TO ULTRASOUND IN AIR
or the (possibly mistaken) belief in its presence (e.g., fear that ultrasound may be causing injury, even if inaudible). Such anxiety might be enhanced if the suf- ferer knows that the exposure is involuntary, that others cannot hear it, that it will continue without their control at their place of work or home or in their child’s class- room, and especially if they think that it is maliciously targeted at them. Indeed, we have received a surpris- ingly large number of inquiries claiming ultrasonic attacks by neighbors, and we always recommend testing for such signals with a smartphone.
This article has not covered the issue of human adverse effects to infrasound or audio frequency sonic deterrents (apart from a brief mention of teen deterrents; Leigh- ton 2016a), such as LRAD devices (which currently do not emit their main signal above ~3 kHz but are some- times inaccurately confused with parametric devices and thought of as high-power “spotlights” for crowd control; Leighton, 2016a). This article also does not cover elec- tromagnetic emissions or ultrasound as applied into the body for fetal scanning. This distinction is mentioned here because these issues are frequently raised by some readers/ listeners when we discuss the adverse effects of ultrasound in air on humans, and they are outside the scope.
Acknowledgments
Financial support from the Colt Foundation (Ref. No. CF/03/15) and the European Metrology Programme of Innovation and Research (EMPIR; Grant 15HLT03 EARII) is gratefully acknowledged. The EMPIR programme is cofi- nanced by the participating states and from the European Union Horizon 2020 research and innovation program.
References
Ashihara, K., Kurakata, K., Mizunami, T., and Matsushita, K. (2006). Hearing threshold for pure tones above 20 kHz. Acoustical Science and Technology 27, 12-19. https://doi.org/10.1250/ast.27.12.
Battista, A. (2019). The effect of 40 kHz ultrasonic noise exposure on human hearing. Proceedings of the 23rd International Congress on Acoustics, Aachen, Germany, September 9-13, 2019, pp. 4783-4788.
Available at https://bit.ly/3gMHYxT. Accessed May 30, 2020. Boothroyd, A., and Cawkwell, S. (1970). Vibrotactile thresholds in
pure tone audiometry. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 69, 381-387. Conein, E. (2006). Compound Security Systems ‘Mosquito’ Sonic Deterrent Report on Acoustic Tests Performed 6th April 2006. NHS
Memorandum Ref. 06nstaffsp.com dated April 12, 2006, Glouces- ter Hospitals, Gloucester, UK. Available at https://bit.ly/2XqFfCv.
Accessed May 30, 2020.
Della Sala, S., and Cubelli, R. (2018). Alleged “sonic attack” supported
by poor neuropsychology. Cortex 103, 387-388. 24 Acoustics Today • Fall 2020
Dolder, C. N., Fletcher, M. D., Lloyd Jones, S., Lineton, B., Dennison, S. R., Symmonds, M., White, P. R., and Leighton, T. G. (2018). Measure- ments of ultrasonic deterrents and an acoustically branded hairdryer:
Ambiguities in guideline compliance. The Journal of the Acoustical Soci-
ety of America 144, 2565-2574. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5064279. Dolder, C. N., Fletcher, M. D., Lloyd Jones, S., Lineton, B., and Leighton, T. G. (2019). Exposure levels for parametric arrays in light of guideline ambiguities. Proceedings of the 23rd International Congress on Acoustics,
Aachen, Germany, September 9-13, 2019, pp. 6359-6362. Available at http://pub.dega-akustik.de/ICA2019/data/ICA19_manuscripts_all.pdf.
Accessed January 1, 2020.
EARS II (2019). Final Publishable Report: Metrology for modern
hearing assessment and protecting public health from emerging noise sources. Project No. 15HLT03, EURAMET, Braumschwieg, Germany. Available at https://bit.ly/3ch1leP. Accessed May 28, 2020.
Fastl, H., and Zwicker, E. (2007). Psychoacoustics: Facts and Models. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, Germany.
Fletcher, M. D., Jones, S. L., White, P. R., Dolder, C. N., Leighton, T. G., and Lineton, B. (2018a). Effects of very high-frequency sound and ultrasound on humans. Part I: Adverse symptoms after exposure to audible very-high frequency sound. The Journal of the Acoustical Soci- ety of America 144, 2511-2520. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5063819.
Fletcher, M. D., Jones, S. L., White, P. R., Dolder, C. N., Leighton, T. G., and Lineton, B. (2018b). Effects of very high-frequency sound and ultra- sound on humans. Part II: A double-blind randomized provocation study of inaudible 20-kHz ultrasound. The Journal of the Acoustical Soci- ety of America 144, 2521-2531. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5063818.
Fletcher, M. D., Jones, S. L., White, P. R., Dolder, C. N., Lineton, B., and Leighton, T. G. (2018c). Public exposure to ultrasound and very high frequency sound in air. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 144, 2554-2564. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5063817.
Howard, C. Q., Hansen, C. H., and Zander, A. C. (2005). A review of current ultrasound exposure limits. Journal of Occupational Health and Safety, Australia and New Zealand 21, 253-257.
INIRC-IRPA (International Non-Ionizing Radiation Committee of the International Radiation Protection Association). (1984). Interim guide- lines on the limits of human exposure to airborne ultrasound. Health Physics 46, 969-974.
Kumar, S., Forster, H. M., Bailey, P., and Griffiths, T. D. (2008). Map- ping unpleasantness of sounds to their auditory representation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 124, 3810-3817. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3006380.
Kurakata, K., Mizunami, T., and Matsushita, K. (2013). Sensory unpleasantness of high-frequency sounds. Acoustical Science and Technology 34, 26-33.
https://doi.org/10.1250/ast.34.26.
Leighton, T. G. (2016a). Are some people suffering as a result of increasing mass exposure of the public to ultrasound in air? Proceed- ings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences 472, Article ID 20150624. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2015.0624.
Leighton, T. G. (2016b). How a Smartphone or Tablet Computer Can Monitor for Ultrasound in Air. Available at https://bit.ly/2MmF3xR. Accessed May 10, 2020.
Leighton, T. G. (2017). Comment on ‘Are some people suffering as a result of increasing mass exposure of the public to ultrasound in air?’ Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences 473, Article ID 2060828. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2016.0828.
               

































































   22   23   24   25   26