Page 22 - Special Issue
P. 22

bioacoustic Monitoring Contributes
to an Understanding of Climate Change
Cox, T. M., Ragen, T. J., and Read, A. J. (2006). “Understanding the impacts
Morton, E.S. (1975). “Ecological sources of selection on avian sounds,” American Naturalist 109, 17–34.
Narins, P.M., and Capranica, R.R. (1976). “Sexual differences in the audi- tory system of the tree frog Eleutherodactylus coqui,” Science 192, 378– 380.
Narins, P. M., and Meenderink, S. W. F. (2014). “Climate change and frog calls: long-term correlations along a tropical altitudinal gradient,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 281, 20140401.
of anthropogenic sound on beaked whales,” Journal of Cetacean Research ocean because logistics have prevented scientists from acidi-
Management 7, 177-187.
fying the large volumes of seawater necessary to observe de- Denes, S. L., Miksis-Olds, J. L., Mellinger, D. K., and Nystuen, J. A. (2014).
creases in absorption.
“Assessing the cross platform performance of marine mammal indicators
between two collocated acoustic recorders,” Ecological Informatics 21: 74-
In addition to the decrease in sound absorption, the reduc- 80.
K., Haak, D. C., and Martin, P. R. (2008). “Impacts of climate warming on Larval fish are thought to rely on sensory cues such as ol-
Navas, C. A. (1996). “The effect of temperature on the vocal activity of tropi- cal anurans: A comparison of high and low-elevation species,” Journal of
terrestrial ectotherms across latitude,” Proceedings of the National Acad- faction and hearing for predator avoidance and for localiz-
emy of Sciences 105, 6668–6672.
ing reef settlement sites. Noisy reefs indicate the presence Farina, A. and Pieretti, N. (2014). “Sonic environment and vegetation struc-
Figure 3: Effect of carbon dioxide concentration on auditory be- Herpetology 30, 488–497.
otfuprer:eAdamteotrhso,dsoologmicoalsatplparrovaachl fifosrha wsoiulnl dasvcoapide atnhaelysseisnoof aisMy esdititesr-.
havior of juvenile clownfish. Fish reared in ambient CO2 conditions
2 Larval clownfish reared in waters with elevated CO levels
avoided simulated predator noise, whereas fish reared in elevated
ranean maqui,” Ecological Informatics 21, 120-132.
Gnanadesikan, A., et al. (2005). “Anthropogenic ocean acidification over cathrebotwnednitoyx-fiidrsetecnevnitruornymanedntistsdimdpnaocttaovnoicdaltchifeyninogisoer.gFaingiusmres,a”dNaapttuerde fr4o3m7, 6S8im1–p6s8o6n. et al. (2011).
Paaijmans, K. P., Heinig, R. L., Seliga, R. A., Blanford, J. I., Blanford, S.,
Foote, A. D., Osborne, R. W., and Rus Hoelzel, A. (2004). “Whale-call re- did not avoid noisy sites; instead, they demonstrated no pref-
sponse to masking boat noise,” Nature 428, 910.
erence for sites depending on noise level (Figure 3; Simpson Frommolt, K.-H. and Tauchert, K.-H. (2014). “Applying bioacoustic meth-
ods for long-term monitoring of a nocturnal wetland bird,” Ecological In- et al., 2011). This suggests that ocean acidification may result
Murdock, C. C., and Thomas, M. B. (2013). “Temperature variation makes specotontshesrmfrsomoraeusednistiotirvye tnouclcimleaitienchtahnegeb,”rGailnobvalaCriheadngwe iBtiholohgoyu1s9-,
formatics 21, 4-12.
in a breakdown of predator avoidance among fish species by
ing temperature (Wysocki et al., 2009); at high temperatures,
Gage, S. H. and Axel, A. C. (2014). “Visualization of temporal change in
disrupting their ability to detect and localize sound sources. soundscape power of a Michigan lake habitat over a 4-year period,” Eco-
Parks, S. E., Johnson, M., Nowacek, D., and Tyack, P. L. (2011). “Individual thresholds increased and hearing sensitivity decreased. The right whales call louder in increased environmental noise,” Biology Letters
logical Informatics 21, 100-109.
Gerhardt, H.C., and Huber, F. (2002). Acoustic Communication in Insects
magnitude of these changes varied between the two species, 7, 33–35.
freshwater species
aPnardksw, Sa.sEf.u, Mrtihkesirs-aOffldesc, tJe. dL.,baynhd oDwenleosn, Sg. tLh. e(2fi01sh4)e. s“Awsseersesinkgepmtaaritnae
ecosystem acoustic diversity across ocean basins,” Ecological Informatics particular temperature. These results have particular impli-
and Aanurans. (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL). Predicting the impact of climate change on freshwater spe- Gibbs, J. P., and Breisch, A. R. (2001). “Climate warming and calling phe-
cies is more difficult. The size of many freshwater systems nology of frogs near Ithaca, New York, 1900–1999,” Conservation Biology
21: 81-88.
cations for how fishes may respond to climate change. First, Payne,R.,andWebb,D.(1971).“Orientationbymeansoflongrangeacous-
Hester, K. C., Peltzer, E. T., Kirkwood, W. J., and Brewer, P. G. (2008). “Un- which constrains the accuracy of climate projections for
tetimc spigenraltinugreinwbiallleenowthaafflesc,”tAtnhneahlseoafrtihnegNseewnYsoitrikvAitcyadoefmayllosfpScei-
anticipated consequences of ocean acidification: A noisier ocean at lower these environments (Hobday and Lough, 2011). Addition-
ences 188, 110–141.
cies to the same degree, and second, if animals can acclimate
pH,” Geophysical Research Letters 35, L19601.
Pijanowski, B.C., Farina, A., Gage, S. H., Dumyahn, S.L., and Krause, B.L. to temperature variations, then the negative consequences (2011). “What is soundscape ecology? An introduction and overview of an
ally, unlike the relatively homogenous oceans, freshwater Hobday, A. J. and Lough, J. M. (2011). "Projected climate change in Aus-
of increased temperature on hearing sensitivity may be less- emerging science,” Landscape Ecology 26, 1213-1232.
tralian marine and freshwater environments," Marine and Freshwater Re- systems are enclosed and habitat specific. Because climate
J. (2014). “Temporal and spatial variability of animal sound within a neo-
models predict droughts in some regions and heavier rainfall
IPCC (2013). “Summary for Policymakers,” In: Climate Change 2013: The
in others, we cannot create a unifying prediction as to how Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth As-
tropical forest,” Ecological Informatics 21, 133-143.
effect on Aerially
ited by T.F. Stocker, D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Bosc- Lough, 2011). For example, streams associated with melt-
climate change on tropical birds,” Biological Conservation 148, 1–18. CSimlimpsaonte, Sc.hDa.,nMguenidmayp, Pa.cLt.s, Wteitrtreensrticrhia, Ml s.pLe.,cMieasnassaw, Re.l,lDaisxsaoqn,uDa.tLic.,
hung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex and P.M. Midgley. (Cambridge University ing glaciers may increase in flow and volume as the planet
Gagliano, M., and Yan, H. Y. (2011). “Ocean acidification erodes crucial species. Changes in temperature (Figure 1- see page 9), pre-
Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA), pp.1-28.
warms, whereas lakes and ponds in other regions may desic- Joseph, J. E., and Chiu, C.-S. (2010). “A computational assessment of the
auditory behaviour in a marine fish,” Biology Letters 7, 917–920.
casetnesiatisvithy osf eamenbiveinrtonomisenletvseletxopoecreiaencaceidifircoautigohn,t”sJ.oIunrncarleoafsethde Acoustical Society of America 128, EL144.
cipitation, and CO2 levels, combined with the increased Snell-Rood, E. C. (2012). “The effect of climate on acoustic signals: Does at-
temperatures can result in a decrease in aquatic mixing and Lengagne, T., and Slater, P. J. B. (2002). “The effects of rain on acoustic com- turnover, resulting in stratified regions with hypoxic condi-
clmimosapthiecricvsaoruinadbialbitsyorpctaiounsmedattberyfogr lboirbdaslonwgarnmd binatge,chcoalnocaitniointi?-”
munication: tawny owls have good reason for calling less in wet weather,”
Stiebler, I. B., and Narins, P. M. (1990). “Temperature-dependence of au- by altering species distribution, behaviors, and viability. ditory nerve response properties in the frog,” Hearing Research 46, 63–
tions and low pH. Acidification of freshwater systems is pre- Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 269,
As discussed above for aquatic species, studying these im- 82.
dicted, but it is not known if significant changes in sound ab-
pToarctti,sVi.nM.t, earnrdesDturnianl, Ps.pOe. c(i2e0s05i)s. “aVlsaroianbloe tefftercivtsiaolf,cblimecaateucsheanthgesoen
Llusia, D., Márquez, R., Beltrán, J. F., Benítez, M., and do Amaral, J. P. sorption will occur due to the small size of most freshwater
six species of North American birds,” Oecologia 145, 486-495.
impacts vary between different habitats (tropical and tem-
(2013). “Calling behaviour under climate change: geographical and sea-
systems. Clearly more data are needed.
sonal variation of calling temperatures in ectotherms,” Global Change Bi-
Towsey, M., Wimmer, J., Williamson, I. and Roe, P. (2014). “The use of perate zones, high and low elevations; Navas, 1996; Deutsch acoustic indices to determine avian species richness in audio-recordings
ology 19, 2655–2674.
An additional factor to consider in predicting the impact Meenderink, S.W.F., and van Dijk, P. (2006). “Temperature dependence of
et al., 2008), and between different species (longer-lived of the environment,” Ecological Informatics 21, 110-119.
on climate change in freshwater environments is the effect anuran distortion product otoacoustic emissions,” Journal of the Associa-
sTpraemcioenstinsu, Ach.Da.,sanbdirBdrsenmowaiytzb, Ee.Aaff. (e2c0t0e0d). in“Seaasdoinffalerpelansticmityaninntehre
otfioanmfobriReensteatrecmh ipneOrtaotluaryengoonlogthy e7, a2u46d-i2t5o2r. y system. Fishes are
adult brain,” Trends in Neuroscience 23, 251-258.
than shorter-lived species such as insects; Şekercioğlu et al.,
Miller, J. H., Kloepper, L. N., Potty, G. R., Spivack, A. J., D'Hondt, S., and ectotherms that regulate their body temperature by refer-
Wiley, R.H., and Richards, D.B. (1978). “Physical constraints on acoustic
Turner, C. (2014). “The effects of pH on acoustic transmission loss in an ence to external temperature, rather than by internal physi-
2012). Because of the complexity and variability of different communication in the atmosphere: implications for the evolution of ani-
estuary,” JASA Express Letters, in preparation.
ological setpoints. The water temperature at which animals
hmabailtvaotcsalaiznatdionths,”eBdehiffaveiroeranltEcloifleoghy iasntdorSioecsioboifolsopgyec3i, in
Miller, P. J.O., Biassoni, N., Samuels, A., and Tyack, P. (2000). “Whale songs
Wysocki, L.E., Montey, K., and Popper, A.N. (2009). "The influence of ambi- these habitats, we still do not know which species will ac-
lengthen in response to sonar,” Nature 405, 903.
were housed affects the hearing sensitivities of two species
ent temperature and thermal acclimation on hearing in a eurythermal and climate and adapt to a changed habitat, which will disperse a stenothermal otophysan fish," The Journal of Experimental Biology 212,
Moller, A. P. (2011). “When climate change affects where birds sing,” Behav- of catfish, the channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) and the
to other habitats, and which may go extinct. This is where 3091-3099.
ioral Ecology 22, 212–217.
tropical catfish (Pimelodus pictus). Thresholds of neural re-
animal bioacoustics can play a major role, both by providing
| 15
22 | Acoustics Today | Spring 2020, Special Issue 10 | Acoustics Today | Summer 2014
Reprinted from volume 10, issue 3
Orr, J. C., Fabry, V. J., Aumont, O., Bopp, L., Doney, S. C., Feely, R. A.,
Şekercioğlu, Ç. H., Primack, R. B., and Wormworth, J. (2012). “The effects of
Communicating Animals
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 131, 1650-1658.
ate or exacerbate habitat loss and thus affect biodiversity
   20   21   22   23   24