Page 51 - Spring 2018
P. 51

McKinney, M. L. (2002). Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation. Bio- Science 52, 883-890.
Mennitt, D. J., Fristrup, K. M., and Nelson, L. (2015). A spatially explicit estimate of environmental noise exposure in the contiguous United States. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 137, 2339-2340.
Morton, E. S. (1975). Ecological sources of selection on avian sounds. American Naturalist 109, 17-34.
Passchier-Vermeer, W., and Passchier, W. F. (2000). Noise exposure and pub- lic health. Environmental Health Perspectives 108 (Suppl. 1), 123-131.
Patricelli, G. L., and Blickley, J. L. (2006). Avian communication in ur- ban noise: Causes and consequences of vocal adjustment. Auk 123, 639- 649.
Pijanowski, B. C., Farina, A., Gage, S. H., Dumyahn, S. L., and Krause, B. L. (2011). What is soundscape ecology? An introduction and overview of an emerging new science. Landscape Ecology 26, 1213-1232.
Pytte, C. L., Rush, K. M., and Ficken, M. S. (2003). Regulation of vocal am- plitude by the blue-throated hummingbird, Lampornis clemenciae. Animal Behaviour 66, 703-710.
Read, J., Jones, G., and Radford, A. N. (2014). Fitness costs as well as ben- efits are important when considering responses to anthropogenic noise. Behavioral Ecology 25, 4-7.
Ryan, M. J., and Brenowitz, E. A. (1985). The role of body size, phylogeny, and ambient noise in the evolution of bird song. American Naturalist 126, 87-100.
Slabbekoorn, H. (2004). Singing in the wild: The ecology of birdsong. In Marler, P., and Slabbekoorn, H. (Eds.), Nature’s Music. The Science of Bird- song. Academic Press/Elsevier, San Diego, CA, pp. 178-205.
Slabbekoorn, H. (2013). Songs of the city: Noise-dependent spectral plasticity in the acoustic phenotype of urban birds. Animal Behaviour 85, 1089-1099.
Slabbekoorn, H. (2017). Animal communication: Competition for acoustic space in birds and fish. In Gordon, R., and Seckbach, J. (Eds.), Biocommu- nication. Sign-Mediated Interactions Between Cells and Organisms. World Scientific, Hoboken, NJ, pp. 327-363
Slabbekoorn, H., and den Boer-Visser, A. (2006). Cities change the songs of birds. Current Biology 16, 2326-2331.
Slabbekoorn, H., and Peet, M. (2003). Ecology: Birds sing at a higher pitch in urban noise. Nature 424, 267.
Slabbekoorn, H., and Ripmeester, E. A. P. (2008). Birdsong and anthropo- genic noise: Implications and applications for conservation. Molecular Ecology 17, 72-83.
ten Cate, C. (2004). Birdsong and evolution. In Marler, P., and Slabbekoorn, H. (Eds.), Nature’s Music. The Science of Birdsong. Academic Press/Elsevier, San Diego, CA, pp. 296-317.
Warren, P. S., Katti, M., Ermann, M., and Brazel, A. (2006). Urban bioacous- tics: It’s not just noise. Animal Behaviour 71, 491-502.
Wiley, R. H. (2015). Noise Matters: The Evolution of Communication. Har- vard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Wiley, R. H., and Richards, D. G. (1982). Adaptations for acoustic commu- nication in birds: Sound transmission and signal detection. In Kroodsma, D. E., and Miller, E. H. (Eds.), Acoustic Communication in Birds. Academic Press, New York, pp. 131-181.
Yang, X.-J., Ma, X.-R., and Slabbekoorn, H. (2014). Timing vocal behavior: Experimental evidence for song overlap avoidance in Eurasian wrens. Be- havioral Processes 103, 84-90.
Yang, X.-J., and Slabbekoorn, H. (2014). Timing vocal behavior: Lack of temporal overlap avoidance to fluctuating noise levels in singing Eurasian wrens. Behavioral Processes 108, 131-137.
Biosketch
Hans Slabbekoorn is an associate pro- fessor at the Institute of Biology, Fac- ulty of Science, Leiden University, The Netherlands. His expertise is in animal behavior, evolutionary ecology, and bio- acoustics in air and water. His core re- search theme is the function and evolu- tion of acoustic signals and natural and
anthropogenic noise impact on animals. He integrates this field with studies on animal personality, stress physiology, dynamic energy budget models, and a population conse- quences of acoustic disturbance framework. He believes it is critical to listen to nature and that sound science can ben- efit decision making about the balance between ecology and economy.
     Be Heard!
Students, get more involved with the ASA through our student council at:
http://asastudentcouncil.org/ get-involved/
  Want to Read More?
Find back issues of Acoustics Today at:
http://acousticstoday.org/past-issues/
Spring 2018 | Acoustics Today | 49




































































   49   50   51   52   53