Page 19 - Winter Issue 2018
P. 19

Billings, C. I., Papesh, M. A., Penman, T. M., Baltzell, L. S., and Gallun, F. I. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4791710.
(2012). Clinical use of aided cortical auditory evoked potentials Killion, M., Niquette, P., Gudmundsen, G., Revit, L., and Banerjee, S.
as a measure of physiological detection or physiological discrim- (2004). Development of a quick speech-in-noise test for measuring
ination. International Iournal of Otolaryngology 2012, 365752. signal-to-noise ratio loss in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired lis-
https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/365752. teners. The Iournal of the Acoustical Society of America 116, 2395-2405.

Brownell, W E. (2017). What is electromotility? - The history of its discov- https://doi.org/ 10.1 121/ 1.1784440.
ery and its relevance to acoustics. Acoustics Today 13(1), 20-27. Kuchinsky, S. E., Vaden, K. 1., Ir., Ahlstrom, I. B., Cute, S. L., Hu.mes, L.

Caspary, D. M., Hughes, L. F., and Ling, L. L. (2013). Age-related GABAA E., Dubno, I. R., and Eckert, M. A. (2016). Task-related vigilance dur-
receptor changesin rat auditorycortex Neurobiology ofAging34(5), 1486- ing word recognition in noise for older adults with hearing loss. Ex-
1496. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.11.009. perimental Aging Research 42(1), 50-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/036107

Das, N., Van Eyndhoven, S., Francart, T., and Bertrand, A. (2016). Adaptive 3x.2016.1108712.
attention-driven speech enhancement for EEG-informed hearing prosthe- Lin, F. R., Yaffe, K., Xia, I., Xue, Q.-L., Harris, T. B., Purchase-Helzner, E.,
ses. Proceedings of the 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Satterfield, S., Ayonayon, H. N., Ferrucci, L., Simonsick, E. M., and Health
Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Orlando, FL, August 16-20, ABC Study Group F (2013). Hearing loss and cognitive decline in older
2016, pp. 77-80. https://doi.org/10.1109/embc.2016.7590644. adults. [AMA Internal Medicine 173(4), 293-299. https://doi.org/10.1001/

Ding, N., and Simon, I. Z. (2012). Emergence of neural encoding of audi- jama.internmed.2013.1868.
tory objects while listening to competing speakers. Proceedings of the Na- Lonsbury-Martin, B. L., Stagner, B. B., and Martin, G. K. (2017). Oto-
tional Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109(29), 11854- acoustic emissions: Can laboratory research improve their clinical utility?
11859. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1205381109. Acoustics Today 13(3), 44-51.

Dubno, I. R., Dirks, D., and Morgan, D. (1984). Effects of age and mild hear- O’Sullivan, I. A., Power, A. I., Mesgarani, N., Rajaram, S., Foxe, I. I., Shinn-
ing loss on speech recognition in noise. The Iournal of the Acoustical Soci- Cunningham, B. G., Shinn-Cunningham, B. G., Slaney, M., Shamma, S.
ety ofAmerica 76, 87-96. A., and Lalor, E. C. (2015). Attentional selection in a cocktail party en-

Dubno, I. R., Eckert, M. A., Lee, E S., Matthews, L. I., and Schmiedt, R. A. vironment can be decoded from single-trial EEG. Cerebral Cortex 25(7),
(2013). Classifying human audiometric phenotypes of age-related hearing 1697-1706. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bht355.
loss from animal models. Iournal of the Association for Research in Otolar- Pichora-Fuller, M. K. (2003). Cognitive aging and auditory information
yngologv 14(5), 687-701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-013-0396-x. processing. International Iournal ofAudiology 42, 26-32.

Easwar, V., Purcell, D. W., Aiken, S. I., Parsa, V., and Scollie, S. D. (2015). Presacco, A., Simon, I. Z., and Anderson, S. (2016). Evidence of degrad-
Evaluation of speech-evoked envelope following responses as an objec- ed representation of speech in noise, in the aging midbrain and cortex.
tive aided outcome measure: Effect of stimulus level, bandwidth, and Iournal of Neurophysiology 116(5), 2346-2355. https://doi.org/10.1152/
amplification in adults with hearing loss. Bar and Hearing 36(6), 635- jn.00372.2016.

652. https://doi.org/10.1097/aud.0000000000000199. Saunders, G. H., Smith, S. L., Chisolm, T. H., Frederick, M. T., McArdle,

Engineer, N. D., Riley, I. R., Seale, I. D., Vrana, W A., Shetake, I. A., Sudana- R. A., and Wilson, R. H. (2016). A randomized control trial: Supple-
gunta, S. P., Borland, M. S., and Kilgard, M.P. (2011). Reversing pathological menting hearing aid use with listening and communication enhance-
neural activity using targeted plasticity. Nature 470(7332), 101-104. Avail- ment (LACE) auditory training. Bar and Hearing 37(4), 381-396.
able at https://wwwnature.com/articles/nature09656. https://doi.org/10.1097/aud.0000000000000283.

Florentine, M., Buus, S., Scharf, B., and Zwicker, E. (1980). Frequen- Schaette, R., and McAlpine, D. (2011). Tinnitus with a normal audiogram:
cy selectivity in normally-hearing and hearing-impaired observers. Physiological evidence for hidden hearing loss and computational model.
Iournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 23(3), 646-669. The Iournal ofNeuroscience 31(38), 13452- 13457. https://doi.org/10.1523/
https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.2303.646. INEUROSCL2156-11.2011.

Gatehouse, S., and Noble, W (2004). The speech, spatial and qualities of Sergeyenko, Y., Lall, K., Liberman, M. C., and Kujawa, S. G. (2013). Age-
hearing scale (SSQ). International Iournal ofAudiology 43, 85-99. related cochlear synaptopathy: An early-onset contributor to auditory

Gordon-Salant, S., Yeni-Komshian, G., and Fitzgibbons, P. (2008). The role functional decline. The Iournal of Neuroscience 33(34), 13686-13694.
of temporal cues in word identification by younger and older adults: Ef- https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.1783-13.2013.
fects of sentence context. The Iournal of the Acoustical Society of America Souza, P., Boike, K., Witherell, K., and Tremblay, K. (2007). Prediction of
124(5), 3249-3260. https://doi.org/10.1 121/ 1.2982409. speech recognition from audibility in older listeners with hearing loss: ef-

Guinan, I. I., Ir. (2006). Olivocochlear efferents: Anatomy, physiology, func- fects of age, amplification, and background noise. Iournal of the American
tion, and the measurement of efferent effects in humans. Bar and Hearing Academy ofAudiology 18, 54-65. https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.18.1.5.
27(6), 589-607. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aud.0000240507.83072.e7. Vaden, K. I., Ir., Matthews, L. I., Eckert, M. A., and Dubno, I. R. (2017). Lon-

Ienkins, K. A., Fodor, C., Presacco, A., and Anderson, S. (2017). Effects gitudinal changes in audiometric phenotypes of age-related hearing loss.
of amplification on neural phase locking, amplitude, and latency to a Iournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 18(2), 371-385.
speech syllable. Ear and Hearing 39(4), 810-824. https://doi.org/10. 1097/ https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-016-0596-2.
aud.0000000000000538. Willott, I. E (1991). Central physiological correlates of ageing and

Karawani, H., Ienkins, K., and Anderson, S. (2018). Restoration of sensory presbycusis in mice. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 111(s476), 153-156.
input may improve cognitive and neural function. Neuropsychologia 114, https://doi.org/10.3109/00016489109127271.

203-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.04.041. Wilson, R. H., Carnell, C. S., and Cleghorn, A. L. (2007). The Words-in-

Kidd, G., Favrot, S., Desloge, I. G., Streeter, T. M., and Mason, C. R. Noise (VVIN) test with multitalker babble and speech-spectrum noise
(2013). Design and preliminary testing of a visually guided hearing aid. maskers. Iournal of the American Academy of Audiology 18(6), 522-529.
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 133(3), EL202-EL207. https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.18.6.7.

Winter 2018 | Acnuseics Thclay | 17






















   17   18   19   20   21