Page 34 - Fall2020
P. 34

BIOMECHANICS OF THE MIDDLE EAR
via air conduction through the middle ear. Sound can also reach the cochlea via bone-conduction pathways, in which the middle ear also plays an important role (Stenfelt, 2013).
Otologists often perform surgery to restore function in damaged or diseased middle ears, such as patching a damaged eardrum, replacing an eroded incus with a prosthesis, or bypassing a stapes immobilized by otoscle- rotic bone growth with a prosthesis inserted into a hole in the footplate (Merchant and Rosowski, 2013). Before surgery can be performed, however, a proper diagnosis has to be made. The noninvasive diagnosis of middle ear pathologies is an important area of clinical research, particularly in the case of newborns because they cannot participate in standard clinical tests (Keefe et al., 2012). Surgery is more common in patients with middle ear pathologies. For patients with cochlear damage, a clini- cian will typically prescribe an acoustic hearing aid to provide amplified sound. However, a number of groups have been developing implantable hearing aids that amplify sound by mechanically vibrating the ossicles. A major advantage of these devices is reduced feedback, which allows greater amplification and wider bandwidth. Although these new devices cost more than traditional acoustic hearing aids, they can enable improved sound quality and better hearing in noisy environments (Puria, 2013). A nonimplantable alternative has also been devel- oped that contacts the eardrum from the ear canal side and mechanically vibrates the malleus (Puria, 2013).
Conclusions
Like a trusty sailboat with a seasoned captain, the mam- malian middle ear is able to navigate through a sea of complexity to provide a smooth and graceful experience of the environment. And much as a small, nimble craft must adapt to the perils of seafaring in different ways than a larger, more robust ship, the middle ear too has evolved in clever ways to suit the needs of different species. Although a multitude of vibration modes on the eardrum and many varied motions of the ossicles are involved in this voyage, the middle ear reveals none of these secrets until we get on board and examine it using modern measurement tools and computational approaches. Finally, by straddling the worlds of acoustics, mechanics, materials science, fluid mechanics, biology, medicine, computational modeling, and technology, the middle ear provides an ideal play- ground for an interdisciplinary crew of adventure-seeking collaborative researchers.
Acknowledgments
Some of my work described here has been funded by the National Institute on Deafness and Communication Dis- orders, National Institutes of Health, and, more recently, by the Amelia Peabody Charitable Fund. I am grateful to the entire OtoBiomechanics Group at the Eaton-Pea- body Laboratories and particularly Kevin N. O’Connor for assistance on multiple levels.
References
Anthwal, N., Joshi, L., and Tucker, A. S. (2013). Evolution of the mammalian middle ear and jaw: Adaptations and novel structures. Journal of Anatomy 222, 147-160.
Brownell, W. E. (2017). What is electromotility?—The history of its discovery and its relevance to acoustics. Acoustics Today 13(1), 20-27.
Cheng, J. T., Hamade, M., Merchant, S. N., Rosowski, J. J., Harrington, E., and Furlong, C. (2013). Wave motion on the surface of the human tympanic membrane: Holographic measurement and modeling anal- ysis. The Journal of Acoustical Society of America 133(2), 918-937. de La Rochefoucauld, O., Kachroo, P., and Olson, E. S. (2010). Ossicu- lar motion related to middle ear transmission delay in gerbil. Hearing Research 270(1-2), 158-172.
Dong, W., Varavva, P., and Olson, E. S. (2013). Sound transmission along the ossicular chain in common wild-type laboratory mice. Hearing Research 301, 27-34.
Fay, J. P., Puria, S., and Steele, C. R. (2006). The discordant eardrum.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States
of America 103(52), 19743-19748.
Funnell, W. R., Decraemer, W. F., and Khanna, S. M. (1987). On
the damped frequency response of a finite-element model of the cat eardrum. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 81, 1851-1859.
Gottlieb, P. K., Vaisbuch, Y., and Puria, S. (2018). Human ossicu- lar-joint flexibility transforms the peak amplitude and width of impulsive acoustic stimuli. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of
America 143, 3418-3433.
Gould, S. J. (2010). Eight Little Piggies: Reflections in Natural History.
W. W. Norton, New York.
Gruters, K. G., Murphy, D. L. K., Jenson, C. D., Smith, D. W., Shera, C.
A., and Groh, J. M. (2018). The eardrums move when the eyes move: A multisensory effect on the mechanics of hearing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 115, E1309-E1318.
Heffner, H., and Heffner, R. (2016). The evolution of mammalian sound localization. Acoustics Today 12(1), 20-28.
Keefe, D. H., Sanford, C. A., Ellison, J. C., Fitzpatrick, D. F., and Gorga, M. P. (2012). Wideband aural acoustic absorbance predicts conductive hear- ing loss in children. International Journal of Audiology 51, 880-891.
Manley, G. A. (2010). An evolutionary perspective on middle ears. Hearing Research 263, 3-8.
Mason, M. J. (2013). Of mice, moles and guinea pigs: Functional morphol- ogy of the middle ear in living mammals. Hearing Research 301, 4-18.
Merchant, S. N., and Rosowski, J. J. (2013). Surgical reconstruction and passive prostheses. In S. Puria, R. R. Fay, and A. N. Popper (Eds.), The Middle Ear: Science, Otosurgery, and Technology, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 253-272.
34 Acoustics Today • Fall 2020






































































   32   33   34   35   36