Page 13 - Special Issue
P. 13

 Klatte, M., Bergström, K., and Lachmann, T. (2013). Does noise af- fect learning? A short review on noise effects on cognitive performance in children. Frontiers in Psychology 4, 578. fpsyg.2013.00578.
Klatte, M., Lachmann, T., and Meis, M. (2010). Effects of noise and rever- beration on speech perception and listening comprehension of children and adults in a classroom-like setting. Noise & Health 12, 270-282.
Klatte, M., Spilski, J., Mayerl, J., Möhler, U., Lachmann, T., and Berg- ström, K. (2017). Effects of aircraft noise on reading and qual- ity of life in primary school children in Germany: Results from the NORAH study. Environment and Behavior 49, 390-424. https://doi. org/10.1177/0013916516642580.
Knecht, H. A., Nelson, P. B., Whitelaw, G. M., and Feth, L. L. (2002). Back- ground noise levels and reverberation times in unoccupied classrooms: predictions and measurements. American Journal of Audiology 11, 65-71.
Lewis, D. E., Manninen, C. M., Valente, D. L., and Smith, N. A. (2014). Chil- dren’s understanding of instructions presented in noise and reverberation. American Journal of Audiology 23, 326-336. AJA-14-0020.
Lombard, E. (1911). Le signe de l’elevation de la voix. Annales des Maladies de L’Oreille et du Larynx 37, 101-109.
Nelson, E. L., Smaldino, J., Erler, S., and Garstecki, D. (2008). Background noise levels and reverberation times in old and new elementary school classrooms. Journal of Educational Audiology 14, 16-22.
Neuman, A., Wroblewski, M., Hajicek, J., and Rubinstein, A. (2010). Com-
bined effects of noise and reverberation on speech recognition perfor- mance of normal-hearing children and adults. Ear and Hearing 31, 336- 344.
Pearsons, K. S., Bennett, R. L., and Fidell, S. (1977). Speech Levels in Vari- ous Noise Environments. Office of Health and Ecological Effects, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Wash- ington, DC.
Picard, M., and Bradley, J. S. (2001). Revisiting speech inter- ference in classrooms. Audiology 40, 221-244. https://doi. org/10.3109/00206090109073117.
Prodi, N., and Visentin, C. (2015). Listening efficiency during lessons under various types of noise. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 138, 2438-2448.
Prodi, N., Visentin, C., and Farnetani, A. (2010). Intelligibility, listen- ing difficulty and listening efficiency in auralized classrooms. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 128, 172-181. https://doi. org/10.1121/1.3436563.
Prodi, N., Visentin, C., and Feletti, A. (2013). On the perception of speech in primary school classrooms: Ranking of noise interference and of age influence. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 133, 255-268.
Puglisi, G. E., Astolfi, A., Cutival, L. C. C., and Carullo, A. (2017). Four- day-follow-up study on the voice monitoring of primary school teach- ers: Relationships with conversational task and classroom acoustics. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 141, 441-452. https://doi. org/10.1121/1.4973805.
   Building Acousti Test Solution
Image from “The Invention and Evolution of the Piano” by
Nicholas Giordano, in Acoustics Today volume 12, issue 1.
NTi Audio Inc., Tigard, Oregon, US
 Image from “Regeneration of Auditory Hair Cells: A Potential Treatment for Hearing Loss on the Horizon” by Rebecca M. Lewis, Edwin W Rubel, and Jennifer S. Stone, in Acoustics Today volume
12, issue 2. Complies with ASTM Standards
P: 0503 684 7050 E:
Fall 2018 | Acoustics Today | 21 Spring 2020, Special Issue | Acoustics Today | 13
Reprinted from volume 14, issue 3

   11   12   13   14   15