Page 13 - Special Issue

Klatte, M., Bergström, K., and Lachmann, T. (2013). Does noise af- fect learning? A short review on noise effects on cognitive performance in children. Frontiers in Psychology 4, 578. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpsyg.2013.00578.
Klatte, M., Lachmann, T., and Meis, M. (2010). Effects of noise and rever- beration on speech perception and listening comprehension of children and adults in a classroom-like setting. Noise & Health 12, 270-282.
Klatte, M., Spilski, J., Mayerl, J., Möhler, U., Lachmann, T., and Berg- ström, K. (2017). Effects of aircraft noise on reading and qual- ity of life in primary school children in Germany: Results from the NORAH study. Environment and Behavior 49, 390-424. https://doi. org/10.1177/0013916516642580.
Knecht, H. A., Nelson, P. B., Whitelaw, G. M., and Feth, L. L. (2002). Back- ground noise levels and reverberation times in unoccupied classrooms: predictions and measurements. American Journal of Audiology 11, 65-71. https://doi.org/10.1044/1059-0889(2002/009).
Lewis, D. E., Manninen, C. M., Valente, D. L., and Smith, N. A. (2014). Chil- dren’s understanding of instructions presented in noise and reverberation. American Journal of Audiology 23, 326-336. https://doi.org/10.1044/2014_ AJA-14-0020.
Lombard, E. (1911). Le signe de l’elevation de la voix. Annales des Maladies de L’Oreille et du Larynx 37, 101-109.
Nelson, E. L., Smaldino, J., Erler, S., and Garstecki, D. (2008). Background noise levels and reverberation times in old and new elementary school classrooms. Journal of Educational Audiology 14, 16-22.
Neuman, A., Wroblewski, M., Hajicek, J., and Rubinstein, A. (2010). Com-
bined effects of noise and reverberation on speech recognition perfor- mance of normal-hearing children and adults. Ear and Hearing 31, 336- 344. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181d3d514.
Pearsons, K. S., Bennett, R. L., and Fidell, S. (1977). Speech Levels in Vari- ous Noise Environments. Office of Health and Ecological Effects, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Wash- ington, DC.
Picard, M., and Bradley, J. S. (2001). Revisiting speech inter- ference in classrooms. Audiology 40, 221-244. https://doi. org/10.3109/00206090109073117.
Prodi, N., and Visentin, C. (2015). Listening efficiency during lessons under various types of noise. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 138, 2438-2448. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4932053.
Prodi, N., Visentin, C., and Farnetani, A. (2010). Intelligibility, listen- ing difficulty and listening efficiency in auralized classrooms. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 128, 172-181. https://doi. org/10.1121/1.3436563.
Prodi, N., Visentin, C., and Feletti, A. (2013). On the perception of speech in primary school classrooms: Ranking of noise interference and of age influence. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 133, 255-268. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4770259.
Puglisi, G. E., Astolfi, A., Cutival, L. C. C., and Carullo, A. (2017). Four- day-follow-up study on the voice monitoring of primary school teach- ers: Relationships with conversational task and classroom acoustics. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 141, 441-452. https://doi. org/10.1121/1.4973805.
Building Acousti Test Solution
Image from “The Invention and Evolution of the Piano” by
Nicholas Giordano, in Acoustics Today volume 12, issue 1.
https://acousticstoday.org/issues/2016AT/2016Spring/
www.nti-audio.com/XL2
NTi Audio Inc., Tigard, Oregon, US
Image from “Regeneration of Auditory Hair Cells: A Potential Treatment for Hearing Loss on the Horizon” by Rebecca M. Lewis, Edwin W Rubel, and Jennifer S. Stone, in Acoustics Today volume
12, issue 2. https://acousticstoday.org/issues/2016AT/2016Summer/ Complies with ASTM Standards
P: 0503 684 7050 E: americas@nti-audio.com
cs
Fall 2018 | Acoustics Today | 21 Spring 2020, Special Issue | Acoustics Today | 13
Reprinted from volume 14, issue 3