Page 23 - Fall_DTF
P. 23

Klatte, M., Bergstrom, K., and Lachmanm T. (2013). Does noise af- bined effects of noise and reverberation on speech recognition perfor-
fect learning? A short review on noise eifects on cognitive performance mance oi normal-hearing children and adults. Ear and Hearing 31, 336-
in children. Frontiers in Psychology 4, 578. 344. https://doi.orgI10.1097/AUD.0l>013e3181d3d514.
fpsyg.2013.00578. Pearsons, K. S., Bennett, R. L., and Fidell, S. (1977). Speech Leveh in Vari-

Klatte, M., Lachmann, T., and Meis, M. (2010). Etfects of noise and rever- ous Noise Environments. Office of Health and Ecological Etfects, Office of
beratjon on speech perception and listening comprehension or children Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, wash.
and adults in a classroom-like setting. Noise d- Health 12, 270-282. ington, DC.

Klatte, M., Spilski, 1., Mnyerl, 1., Miihler, U., Lachmann, T., and Berg- Picard, M., and Bradley, 1. s. (2001). Revisiting speech inter-
strom, K. (2017). Effects of aircraft noise on reading and qual- ference in classrooms. Audiology 40, 221-244. https://doi.
ity of life in primary school children in Germany: Results from the org/10.3109/00206090109073]17.

NORAH study. Environment and Behavior 49, 390-424. https://doi. Prodi. N., and Visentin, C. (2015). Listening efficiency during lessons under
org/10.1177/0013916516642580. various types of noise. The Iournal ofthe Acoustical Society ofAmerica 138,

Knecht, H. A., Nelson, P. B., Whitelaw, G. M., and Feth, L. L. (2002). Back- 2438-2448.
ground noise levels and reverberation tirnes in iinoocupied classrooms: Prodi. N., visenisn, C., and Farnetani. A. (2010). intelligibility, listen-
predictions and rnensiirenients. American Iournal ofAudioIogy 11, 55-71. ing diificiilty and listening eificiency in aumlized clnsroorns. The Iournal of the Acoustical Society of America 128, 172-181. https://doi.

Lewis, D. E.,Mannineni C. M., Valente, D. L., and Smith,N. A. (2014). Chil- org/10.1121/1.3436563.
dren’s understanding or instructions presented in noise and reverberation. Prodi. N., vrsentin, c., and Feletti. A. (2013). on the perception of speech
American Iournal ofAudiology23,326-336. in primary school classrooms: Ranking oi noise interference and of age
AIA-14-0020. influence. The Iournal ofthe Acoustical Society ofAmerica 133, 255-268.

Lombard, E. (1911). Ie signe de l’elevat.ion de la voix. Annales des Maladies
de Eoreille etdu Larymr 37, 101-109. Puglisi, G. E., Astolfi, A., Cutival, L. C. C., and Carullo, A. (2017). Four-

Nelson, E. L., srnnldino, 1., Erler, s., and Garstecki, 1). (zoos). Background day-follow-up study on the voice rnonitoring or primary school teach-
noise levels and reverberation times in old and new elementary school ers: Relationships with conversational task and classroom acoustics. The
classrooms.Iournalo]EducationalAudiology14, 16-22. Iournal of the Acoustical Society of America 141, 441-452. https://doi.

Neuman, A., Wroblewski, M., I-Lajicek, 1., and Rubinstein, A. (2010). Com- org/10.1121/1.4973805.


S I I I .
Building Acoustics .|NTi
Test Solution Am

‘ x. .,
— ’ ' ' , , ‘i‘~":.'::.:::.--—-—-....,
,( \_.  _ --__ ms
.3‘. \{ t   _ ..  e
  illulfl -r
v; ' ’ . . V _ ‘ ~
www.nti-audio.cornlXL2 _ _
NT) nan ne.,rn.n. om, us Complies with ASTM Standards
P: 0503 S84 7050 E: amaricus@ntl-audimcom
Fall 2013 | Aa:nuII:|I:I Tnduy | 21

   21   22   23   24   25