Page 30 - Spring 2006
P. 30

 induced renal injury by pretreating kidneys with low-energy
shock waves,” J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. (in press) (2006).
23. J.E. Lingeman, “Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy devices: Are we making progress?” in Topics in Clinical Urology, edited by J.E. Lingeman and G.M. Preminger (Igaku-Shoin Medical
Publishers, New York, 1996), pp. 79-96.
24. N. Vakil, S.M. Gracewski, and E.C. Everbach, “Relationship of
model stone properties to fragmentation mechanisms during lithotripsy.” J. Lithotripsy and Stone Disease 3(4), 304-310 (1991).
25. M. Delius, F. Ueberle, and W. Eisenmenger, “Extracorporeal shock waves act by shock wave-gas bubble interaction,” Ultrasound in Med. and Biol. 24, 1055-9 (1998).
26. Y.A. Pishchalnikov, O.A. Sapozhnikov, M.R. Bailey, J.C. Williams, Jr., R.O. Cleveland, T. Colonius, L.A. Crum, A.P. Evan, and J.A. McAteer, “Cavitation bubble cluster activity in the breakage of kidney stones by lithotripter shock waves,” J. Endourol. 17(7), 435-446 (2003).
27. S.L. Zhu, F.H. Cocks, G.M. Preminger, P. Zhong, “The role of stress waves and cavitation in stone comminution in shock wave lithotripsy,” Ultrasound in Med. and Biol. 28, 661-671 (2002).
28. M. Delius, M. Jordan, H. Eizenhoefer, E. Marlinghaus, G. Heine, H.G. Liebich, and W. Brendel, “Biological effects of shock waves: kidney haemorrhage by shock waves in dogs-- administration rate dependence.” Ultrasound in Med. and Biol. 14(8), 689-94 (1988).
29. R.F. Paterson, D.A. Lifshitz, J.E. Lingeman, A.P. Evan, B.A. Connors, J.C. Williams, Jr., and J.A. McAteer, “Stone frag- mentation during shock wave lithotripsy is improved by slow- ing the shock wave rate: Studies with a new animal model.” J. Urol. 168, 2211-2215 (2002).
30. K.T. Pace, D. Ghiculete, M. Harju, and R.J.D’A. Honey, “Shock wave lithotripsy at 60 or 120 shocks per minute: a randomized, double-blind trial,” J. Urol. 174, 595-599 (2005).
31. K. Madbouly, A.M. El-Tiraifi, M. Seida, S.R. El-Faqih, R. Atassi, and R.F. Talic, “Slow versus fast shock wave lithotripsy rate for urolithiasis: a prospective randomized study,” J. Urol. 173, 127-130 (2005).
32. O.A. Sapozhnikov, V.A. Khokhlova, M.R. Bailey, J.C. Williams, Jr., J.A. McAteer, R.O. Cleveland, and L.A. Crum, “Effect of overpressure and pulse repetition frequency on shock wave lithotripsy,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 112(3), 1183-1195 (2002).
33. Y.A. Pishchalnikov, O.A. Sapozhnikov, M.R. Bailey, I.V. Pishchalnikova, J.C. Williams, Jr., and J.A. McAteer, “Cavitation selectively reduces the negative-pressure phase of lithotripter shock pulses,” Acoust. Res. Lett. Online 6(4), 280- 286 (2005).
34. M. Tanguay and T. Colonius, “Progress in modeling and sim- ulation of shock wave lithotripsy (SWL),” Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Cavitation (Osaka, Japan 2003) http://cav2003.me.es.osaka-u.ac.jp/Cav2003/Papers/ Cav03-OS-2-1-010.pdf. See also M. Tanguay, Ph.D. Thesis, California Institute of Technology.
35. R.O. Cleveland, R. Anglade, and R.K. Babayan, “Effect of stone motion on in vitro comminution efficiency of a Storz
 Modulith SLX,” J. Endourol. 18(7), 629-33 (2004).
36. W. Eisenmenger, “The mechanisms of stone fragmentation in
ESWL.” Ultrasound in Med. and Biol. 27, 683-693 (2001).
37. R.O. Cleveland and O.A. Sapozhnikov, “Modeling elastic waves in kidney stones with application to shock wave
lithotripsy,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 118(4), 2667-76 (2005).
38. O.A. Sapozhnikov, M.R. Bailey, A.D. Maxwell, B. MacConaghy, R.O. Cleveland, and L.A. Crum, “Assessing the mechanism of kidney stone comminution by a lithotripter shock pulse,” Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium
on Therapeutic Ultrasound, (Kyoto, Japan, 2005), 164-166.
39. Y.A. Pishchalnikov, J.A. McAteer, I.V. Pishchalnikova, S. Beard, J.C. Williams, Jr., and M.R. Bailey, “Bubbles trapped at the coupling surface of the treatment head significantly reduce acoustic energy delivered in shock wave lithotripsy,” Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Therapeutic
Ultrasound (Boston, MA, October 2005) (in press).
40. L. Eichel, P. Batzold, and E. Erturk, “Operator experience and adequate anesthesia improve treatment outcome with third-
generation lithotripters,” J Endourol. 15, 671-673 (2001).
41. W. Eisenmenger, X.X. Du, C. Tang, S. Zhao, Y. Wang, F. Rong, D. Dai, M. Guan, and A. Qi, “The first clinical results of ‘wide focus and low pressure’ ESWL.” Ultrasound in Med. and Biol.
28(6), 769-774 (2002).
42. M.R. Bailey and D.T. Blackstock, “Intensified cavitation pro-
duced with pressure release and rigid ellipsoidal reflectors,” J.
Acoust. Soc. Am. 99(4, pt. 2), 2560 (1996).
43. D.L. Sokolov, M.R. Bailey, and L.A. Crum, "Dual-pulse
lithotripter accelerates stone fragmentation and reduces cell lysis in vitro,” Ultrasound in Med. and Biol. 29(7), 1045-1052 (2003).
44. E.A. Zabolotskaya, Yu.A. Ilinskii, G.D. Meegan, and M.F. Hamilton, “Bubble interactions in clouds produced during shock wave lithotripsy,” Proceedings of the IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium (IEEE 2004), 890-893.
45. J.C. Williams, Jr., S.C. Kim, C.A. Zarse, J.A. McAteer, and J.E. Lingeman, “Progress in the use of helical CT for imaging uri- nary calculi,” J. Endourol. 18, 937-941 (2004).
46. L-J. Wang, Y-C. Wong, C-K. Chuang, S-H. Chu, C-S. Chen, L- C. See, and Y-J. Chiang, “Predictions of outcomes of renal stones after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy from stone characteristics determined by unenhanced helical computed tomography: a multivariate analysis,” European Radiol. 15, 2238-2243 (2005).
47. C. Bohris, T. Bayer, and C. Lechner, “Hit/miss monitoring of ESWL by spectral Doppler ultrasound,” Ultrasound in Med. and Biol. 29, 705-712 (2003).
48. O.A. Sapozhnikov, L. Trusov, N.R. Owen, M.R. Bailey, and R.O. Cleveland, “Detecting fragmentation of kidney stones in lithotripsy by means of shock wave scattering,” Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Therapeutic Ultrasound (Boston, MA October 2005) (in press).
49. M.R. Bailey, V.A. Khokhlova, O.A. Sapozhnikov, S.G. Kargl, and L.A. Crum, “Physical mechanisms of the therapeutic effect of ultrasound,” Acoust. Phys. 49(4), 369-388 (2003).
28 Acoustics Today, April 2006

























































   28   29   30   31   32